Review





Similar Products

96
MedChemExpress proliferation
Proliferation, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/10058-F4/pmc13487724-185-2-7
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proliferation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec anti f4 80 microbeads ultrapure
Anti F4 80 Microbeads Ultrapure, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/Anti-F4%2F80+MicroBeads+UltraPure%2C+mouse/pmc13428295-41-12-14
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti f4 80 microbeads ultrapure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80
Rat Anti Mouse Monoclonal F4 80, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/Rat+anti+Mouse+F4%2F80/10__22203_slash_ecm__v033a11-129-8-16
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd anti-mouse f4/80
Anti Mouse F4/80, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/Anti-Mouse+F4%2F80/custom%40f21480a02%4042477069
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-mouse f4/80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology anti f4 80
Anti F4 80, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/EMR1+Rabbit+pAb/pmc13050104-94-18-19
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cell Signaling Technology Inc f4 80 antibody
Host responses to mouse subcutaneous implantation of Cu-PIAS. ( A ) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of the implant site after 7, 14, and 21 days. 25-Cu-PIAS mesh is roughly centered in each image and runs horizontally. Mesh material stains homogenously red and is indicated by arrows in the leftmost image of each timepoint. ( B ) Area of 25-Cu-PIAS mesh at each timepoint. Reduction over time indicates degradation of material. ( C ) Blood vessel density around and within the implant sites (CD31 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( D ) Total macrophage density around and within the implant sites <t>(F4/80</t> immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( E ) M2 macrophage density around and within the implant sites (CD163 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( F ) Ratio of macrophages expressing a M2 phenotype at each timepoint. ( G ) Collagen thickness above the implant site of scarring mouse model (CXCR3 −/− ), comparing responses to 15-Cu-PIAS and fibrin gel after 3 and 6 months. Statistics: ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, and ∗∗∗∗ indicate p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively.
F4 80 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/pmc13019081-258-0-5
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
f4 80 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti f4 80
Host responses to mouse subcutaneous implantation of Cu-PIAS. ( A ) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of the implant site after 7, 14, and 21 days. 25-Cu-PIAS mesh is roughly centered in each image and runs horizontally. Mesh material stains homogenously red and is indicated by arrows in the leftmost image of each timepoint. ( B ) Area of 25-Cu-PIAS mesh at each timepoint. Reduction over time indicates degradation of material. ( C ) Blood vessel density around and within the implant sites (CD31 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( D ) Total macrophage density around and within the implant sites <t>(F4/80</t> immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( E ) M2 macrophage density around and within the implant sites (CD163 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( F ) Ratio of macrophages expressing a M2 phenotype at each timepoint. ( G ) Collagen thickness above the implant site of scarring mouse model (CXCR3 −/− ), comparing responses to 15-Cu-PIAS and fibrin gel after 3 and 6 months. Statistics: ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, and ∗∗∗∗ indicate p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively.
Anti F4 80, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/F4%2F80+Antibody/pmc12972984-356-51-74
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec anti-f4/80 microbeads ultrapure, mouse
Host responses to mouse subcutaneous implantation of Cu-PIAS. ( A ) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of the implant site after 7, 14, and 21 days. 25-Cu-PIAS mesh is roughly centered in each image and runs horizontally. Mesh material stains homogenously red and is indicated by arrows in the leftmost image of each timepoint. ( B ) Area of 25-Cu-PIAS mesh at each timepoint. Reduction over time indicates degradation of material. ( C ) Blood vessel density around and within the implant sites (CD31 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( D ) Total macrophage density around and within the implant sites <t>(F4/80</t> immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( E ) M2 macrophage density around and within the implant sites (CD163 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( F ) Ratio of macrophages expressing a M2 phenotype at each timepoint. ( G ) Collagen thickness above the implant site of scarring mouse model (CXCR3 −/− ), comparing responses to 15-Cu-PIAS and fibrin gel after 3 and 6 months. Statistics: ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, and ∗∗∗∗ indicate p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively.
Anti F4/80 Microbeads Ultrapure, Mouse, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/Anti-F4%2F80+MicroBeads+UltraPure%2C+mouse/custom%40130-110-443%4042521400
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-f4/80 microbeads ultrapure, mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology f4 80
LILRB4 is associated with macrophages in the OC immune microenvironment. (A) Correlation of StromalScore, ImmuneScore, and ESTIMATEScore with LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV patients. (B) UMAP visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data from the OV_EMTAB8107 tumor dataset (left) and corresponding LILRB4 expression across different cell clusters (right). (C) Distribution of LILRB4 expression across various cell types in GEO-derived single-cell datasets, analyzed using the TISCH2 database ( http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/ ), with darker colors indicating higher expression levels. (D) Correlation between macrophage enrichment scores and LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV samples, as determined by ssGSEA. (E) Relative mRNA expression <t>of</t> <t>F4/80</t> in orthotopic ovarian tumor models (NC and sh-LILRB4 groups). (F) Representative IHC images showing F4/80 expression in orthotopic ovarian tumors (n = 3). Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) Representative IHC staining of CD68 and LILRB4 in corresponding regions of human OC tissues (n = 3). All panels are shown at the same magnification. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.
F4 80, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/EMR1+Rabbit+pAb/pmc13454356-75-30-32
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MedChemExpress c myc inhibitor 10058 f4
LILRB4 is associated with macrophages in the OC immune microenvironment. (A) Correlation of StromalScore, ImmuneScore, and ESTIMATEScore with LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV patients. (B) UMAP visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data from the OV_EMTAB8107 tumor dataset (left) and corresponding LILRB4 expression across different cell clusters (right). (C) Distribution of LILRB4 expression across various cell types in GEO-derived single-cell datasets, analyzed using the TISCH2 database ( http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/ ), with darker colors indicating higher expression levels. (D) Correlation between macrophage enrichment scores and LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV samples, as determined by ssGSEA. (E) Relative mRNA expression <t>of</t> <t>F4/80</t> in orthotopic ovarian tumor models (NC and sh-LILRB4 groups). (F) Representative IHC images showing F4/80 expression in orthotopic ovarian tumors (n = 3). Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) Representative IHC staining of CD68 and LILRB4 in corresponding regions of human OC tissues (n = 3). All panels are shown at the same magnification. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.
C Myc Inhibitor 10058 F4, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/f4/10058-F4/pm42498174-60-21-30
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c myc inhibitor 10058 f4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Host responses to mouse subcutaneous implantation of Cu-PIAS. ( A ) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of the implant site after 7, 14, and 21 days. 25-Cu-PIAS mesh is roughly centered in each image and runs horizontally. Mesh material stains homogenously red and is indicated by arrows in the leftmost image of each timepoint. ( B ) Area of 25-Cu-PIAS mesh at each timepoint. Reduction over time indicates degradation of material. ( C ) Blood vessel density around and within the implant sites (CD31 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( D ) Total macrophage density around and within the implant sites (F4/80 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( E ) M2 macrophage density around and within the implant sites (CD163 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( F ) Ratio of macrophages expressing a M2 phenotype at each timepoint. ( G ) Collagen thickness above the implant site of scarring mouse model (CXCR3 −/− ), comparing responses to 15-Cu-PIAS and fibrin gel after 3 and 6 months. Statistics: ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, and ∗∗∗∗ indicate p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A catalytically active and recyclable bioelastomer inspired by metalloenzymes

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.053

Figure Lengend Snippet: Host responses to mouse subcutaneous implantation of Cu-PIAS. ( A ) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of the implant site after 7, 14, and 21 days. 25-Cu-PIAS mesh is roughly centered in each image and runs horizontally. Mesh material stains homogenously red and is indicated by arrows in the leftmost image of each timepoint. ( B ) Area of 25-Cu-PIAS mesh at each timepoint. Reduction over time indicates degradation of material. ( C ) Blood vessel density around and within the implant sites (CD31 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( D ) Total macrophage density around and within the implant sites (F4/80 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( E ) M2 macrophage density around and within the implant sites (CD163 immunohistochemistry) at each timepoint. ( F ) Ratio of macrophages expressing a M2 phenotype at each timepoint. ( G ) Collagen thickness above the implant site of scarring mouse model (CXCR3 −/− ), comparing responses to 15-Cu-PIAS and fibrin gel after 3 and 6 months. Statistics: ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, and ∗∗∗∗ indicate p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively.

Article Snippet: F4/80 antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers MA, Cat #: 70076).

Techniques: Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Expressing

LILRB4 is associated with macrophages in the OC immune microenvironment. (A) Correlation of StromalScore, ImmuneScore, and ESTIMATEScore with LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV patients. (B) UMAP visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data from the OV_EMTAB8107 tumor dataset (left) and corresponding LILRB4 expression across different cell clusters (right). (C) Distribution of LILRB4 expression across various cell types in GEO-derived single-cell datasets, analyzed using the TISCH2 database ( http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/ ), with darker colors indicating higher expression levels. (D) Correlation between macrophage enrichment scores and LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV samples, as determined by ssGSEA. (E) Relative mRNA expression of F4/80 in orthotopic ovarian tumor models (NC and sh-LILRB4 groups). (F) Representative IHC images showing F4/80 expression in orthotopic ovarian tumors (n = 3). Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) Representative IHC staining of CD68 and LILRB4 in corresponding regions of human OC tissues (n = 3). All panels are shown at the same magnification. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Identification of LILRB4 as a regulator of M2c macrophages and a potential immunotherapeutic target in ovarian cancer

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1866073

Figure Lengend Snippet: LILRB4 is associated with macrophages in the OC immune microenvironment. (A) Correlation of StromalScore, ImmuneScore, and ESTIMATEScore with LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV patients. (B) UMAP visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data from the OV_EMTAB8107 tumor dataset (left) and corresponding LILRB4 expression across different cell clusters (right). (C) Distribution of LILRB4 expression across various cell types in GEO-derived single-cell datasets, analyzed using the TISCH2 database ( http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/ ), with darker colors indicating higher expression levels. (D) Correlation between macrophage enrichment scores and LILRB4 expression in TCGA-OV samples, as determined by ssGSEA. (E) Relative mRNA expression of F4/80 in orthotopic ovarian tumor models (NC and sh-LILRB4 groups). (F) Representative IHC images showing F4/80 expression in orthotopic ovarian tumors (n = 3). Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) Representative IHC staining of CD68 and LILRB4 in corresponding regions of human OC tissues (n = 3). All panels are shown at the same magnification. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: All antibodies used in this study were commercially available: LILRB4 (A7073; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:2000 for WB and 1:200 for immunohistochemistry), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (AB2100; NCM Biotech, Suzhou, China; 1:20,000), F4/80 (A27257; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:200), Ki67 (A20018; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:200), CD68 (A24386PM; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:200), phospho-NF-κB (p-NF-κB; TP56372; Abmart, Shanghai, China; 1:1000), CD163 (A8383SP; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:200), CD8 (A23081; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:200), granzyme B (GZMB) (A2557; ABclonal, Wuhan, China; 1:200), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L)-HRP conjugate (LF102; Epizyme Biotech, Shanghai, China; 1:3000).

Techniques: Expressing, Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Immunohistochemistry, Two Tailed Test